2005 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 1963 DKW Munga
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina (196 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Lumina weights approximately 493 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Chevrolet Lumina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Lumina | 1963 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
| Model | Lumina | Munga |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 196 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1603 kg | 1110 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 31 L |
