2005 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina (196 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Lumina weights approximately 469 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Lumina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Lumina | 1963 Holden EJ | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Lumina | EJ |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 196 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1603 kg | 1134 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2680 mm |
