2005 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 1966 Holden EH
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden EH would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina (196 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1966 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Lumina weights approximately 418 kg more than 1966 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden EH. (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Lumina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Lumina | 1966 Holden EH | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Lumina | EH |
Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2930 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 196 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1603 kg | 1185 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2680 mm |