2005 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 1968 Volvo 145
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 145 would be higher. At 5,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina (328 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1968 Volvo 145. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 1968 Volvo 145. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Lumina weights approximately 354 kg more than 1968 Volvo 145. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina (465 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 308 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Volvo 145. (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Lumina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Volvo 145.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Lumina | 1968 Volvo 145 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | Lumina | 145 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5800 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 328 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Torque | 465 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1664 kg | 1310 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2620 mm |
