2005 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 1971 Volvo 140

To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina (196 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1971 Volvo 140. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 1971 Volvo 140. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Lumina weights approximately 343 kg more than 1971 Volvo 140. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Volvo 140. (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Lumina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Volvo 140.

Compare all specifications: