2005 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 1972 Chrysler 160
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina (196 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Lumina weights approximately 535 kg more than 1972 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Lumina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Lumina | 1972 Chrysler 160 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
Model | Lumina | 160 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1639 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 196 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1603 kg | 1068 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2680 mm |