2005 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 1972 Holden Torana
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Torana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Torana would be higher. At 5,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina (328 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 234 more horse power than 1972 Holden Torana. (94 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 1972 Holden Torana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Lumina weights approximately 710 kg more than 1972 Holden Torana. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina (465 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 302 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Holden Torana. (163 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Lumina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Holden Torana.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Lumina | 1972 Holden Torana | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Lumina | Torana |
Year Released | 2005 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5800 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 465 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1664 kg | 954 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2550 mm |