2005 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 1977 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 5,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina (328 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 1977 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Lumina weights approximately 704 kg more than 1977 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina (465 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 308 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Lumina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Lumina | 1977 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Lumina | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5800 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 465 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1664 kg | 960 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2480 mm |