2005 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 2010 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2010 Saturn Outlook is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Lumina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Lumina would be higher. At 5,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina (328 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2010 Saturn Outlook. (281 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 2010 Saturn Outlook. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Lumina weights approximately 379 kg more than 2010 Saturn Outlook. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Saturn Outlook is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Chevrolet Lumina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Saturn Outlook will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina (465 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Saturn Outlook. (361 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Lumina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Saturn Outlook.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Lumina | 2010 Saturn Outlook | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Saturn |
| Model | Lumina | Outlook |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5800 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 328 HP | 281 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 465 Nm | 361 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3300 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 10.4:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1664 kg | 1285 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3030 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 83 L |
