2005 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 2012 Renault Clio

To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Lumina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Lumina would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina (196 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2012 Renault Clio. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Lumina weights approximately 388 kg more than 2012 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Chevrolet Lumina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Chevrolet Lumina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Clio. (151 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Lumina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Clio.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Chevrolet Lumina 2012 Renault Clio
Make Chevrolet Renault
Model Lumina Clio
Year Released 2005 2012
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3791 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 196 HP 111 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 305 Nm 151 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 4250 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.4:1 9.8:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1603 kg 1215 kg
Wheelbase Size 2880 mm 2580 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 55 L