2005 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1949 Holden FX

To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu (201 HP) has 150 more horse power than 1949 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1949 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 487 kg more than 1949 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1949 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Holden FX.

Compare all specifications: