2005 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1953 Hudson Hornet
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1953 Hudson Hornet. (143 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1953 Hudson Hornet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Hudson Hornet weights approximately 292 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 1953 Hudson Hornet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Hudson Hornet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Malibu | 1953 Hudson Hornet | |
Make | Chevrolet | Hudson |
Model | Malibu | Hornet |
Year Released | 2005 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3490 cc | 4810 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1508 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2990 mm |