2005 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 1022 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Malibu | 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Malibu | Phantom |
Year Released | 2005 | 1959 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 6230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 104.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 91.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1569 kg | 2591 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 6050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 104 L |