2005 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1969 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 3,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (64 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1969 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 598 kg more than 1969 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (96 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Malibu | 1969 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Chevrolet | Riley |
Model | Malibu | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 3490 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 96 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1508 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 25 L |