2005 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1977 Mazda 616
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu (145 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1977 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 506 kg more than 1977 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu (210 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda 616. (124 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Malibu | 1977 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Malibu | 616 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1977 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2196 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 124 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1416 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2480 mm |