2005 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1980 Mazda 929
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 3,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 358 kg more than 1980 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 929. (137 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Malibu | 1980 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Malibu | 929 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3490 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 137 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1508 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 65 L |