2005 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1980 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1980 Seat Ritmo. (53 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1980 Seat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 609 kg more than 1980 Seat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Seat Ritmo. (98 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Seat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Malibu | 1980 Seat Ritmo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
| Model | Malibu | Ritmo |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1714 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 98 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1569 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2460 mm |
