2005 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1982 Fiat Argenta
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Argenta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Argenta would be higher. At 3,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (100 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (135 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Malibu | 1982 Fiat Argenta | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Malibu | Argenta |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3490 cc | 1585 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 135 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 71.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 35 L |