2005 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1982 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 229 kg more than 1982 Mercedes-Benz E.
Because 1982 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 1982 Mercedes-Benz E has manual transmission. 1982 Mercedes-Benz E will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Malibu | 1982 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Malibu | E |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1569 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2800 mm |