2005 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 3,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP) has 130 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 643 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Malibu | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
| Model | Malibu | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3490 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1508 kg | 865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2420 mm |
