2005 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1986 Mazda 929

To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu (201 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1986 Mazda 929. (145 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1986 Mazda 929.

Because 1986 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mazda 929. (230 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mazda 929.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Chevrolet Malibu 1986 Mazda 929
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Malibu 929
Year Released 2005 1986
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3491 cc 1997 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 201 HP 145 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 298 Nm 230 Nm
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 4930 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2720 mm