2005 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1989 Plymouth Laser
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Plymouth Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Plymouth Laser would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu (201 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1989 Plymouth Laser. (133 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1989 Plymouth Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 229 kg more than 1989 Plymouth Laser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Plymouth Laser. (169 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Plymouth Laser.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Malibu | 1989 Plymouth Laser | |
Make | Chevrolet | Plymouth |
Model | Malibu | Laser |
Year Released | 2005 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 169 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1459 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2480 mm |