2005 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1999 GMC Sonoma
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 GMC Sonoma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 GMC Sonoma would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 GMC Sonoma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu (201 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1999 GMC Sonoma. (177 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1999 GMC Sonoma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 GMC Sonoma weights approximately 41 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 1999 GMC Sonoma is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Chevrolet Malibu. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 GMC Sonoma will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 GMC Sonoma (332 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Malibu. (298 Nm). This means 1999 GMC Sonoma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Malibu.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Malibu | 1999 GMC Sonoma | |
| Make | Chevrolet | GMC |
| Model | Malibu | Sonoma |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 4293 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 177 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 332 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1459 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3130 mm |
