2005 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2003 Ford 427
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford 427. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford 427 would be higher. At 6,997 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Ford 427 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford 427 (582 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 382 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Malibu. (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford 427 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 2003 Ford 427 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford 427. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford 427 (704 Nm) has 406 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Malibu. (298 Nm). This means 2003 Ford 427 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Malibu.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Malibu | 2003 Ford 427 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Malibu | 427 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 6997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 582 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 704 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |