2005 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 3,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (94 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Malibu | 2009 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
| Model | Malibu | Clio |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3490 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 50 L |
