2005 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu (201 HP) has 48 more horse power than 2010 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Malibu | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Malibu | Epica |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.1 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |