2005 Chevrolet Matiz vs. 2004 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Matiz is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Titan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Titan would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Titan (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 254 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Matiz. (51 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Titan weights approximately 1618 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Nissan Titan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Chevrolet Matiz. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Titan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Titan (514 Nm) has 443 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Matiz. (71 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Matiz | 2004 Nissan Titan | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
| Model | Matiz | Titan |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 796 cc | 5556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 71 Nm | 514 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 68.5 mm | 98.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 780 kg | 2398 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3560 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.2 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 106 L |
