2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1963 Rover P6
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover P6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover P6 would be higher. At 3,343 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (181 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1963 Rover P6. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover P6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 235 kg more than 1963 Rover P6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Rover P6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Rover P6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (278 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Rover P6. (153 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Rover P6.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 1963 Rover P6 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
Model | Monte Carlo | P6 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3343 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 181 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 278 Nm | 153 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 85.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 85.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 54 L |