2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 3,343 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. (181 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 415 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (278 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (220 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Monte Carlo | RX-01 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3343 cc | 2615 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 181 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Torque | 278 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2350 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 55 L |
