2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2006 Holden Epica
To start off, 2006 Holden Epica is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 3,343 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (181 HP) has 28 more horse power than 2006 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo should accelerate faster than 2006 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (278 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2006 Holden Epica | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Monte Carlo | Epica |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3343 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 181 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 278 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |