2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2009 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2009 Holden Caprice is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Caprice (278 HP) has 78 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
Because 2009 Holden Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Caprice (350 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. (305 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2009 Holden Caprice | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Monte Carlo | Caprice |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3786 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
