2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2009 Mazda 6

To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (169 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 345 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (305 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (228 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo 2009 Mazda 6
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Monte Carlo 6
Year Released 2005 2009
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3786 cc 2488 cc
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 200 HP 169 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 305 Nm 228 Nm
Engine Bore Size 97 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 100 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.4:1 9.7:1
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1470 kg 1125 kg
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1800 mm
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 2730 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.8 L/100km 13.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 64 L