2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 3,343 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (181 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (278 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Clio. (94 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Monte Carlo | Clio |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3343 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 181 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 278 Nm | 94 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 76.8 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 50 L |