2005 Chevrolet S-10 vs. 1953 Riley RM A
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet S-10 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet S-10 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet S-10 weights approximately 235 kg more than 1953 Riley RM A.
Because 2005 Chevrolet S-10 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet S-10 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet S-10 | 1953 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Riley |
| Model | S-10 | RM A |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2196 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2870 mm |
