2005 Chevrolet Silverado vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Silverado is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 5,357 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Silverado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Silverado (295 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 269 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Silverado should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Silverado weights approximately 1704 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Silverado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Silverado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Silverado | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Chevrolet | DAF |
Model | Silverado | Daffodil |
Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5357 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 666 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5740 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 33 L |