2005 Chevrolet Silverado vs. 2006 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2006 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Silverado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Silverado would be higher. At 5,736 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Silverado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 300 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Silverado weights approximately 147 kg more than 2006 Land Rover LR3.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Silverado (488 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Land Rover LR3. (427 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Silverado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Land Rover LR3.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Silverado | 2006 Land Rover LR3 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Land Rover |
Model | Silverado | LR3 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5736 cc | 4392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 488 Nm | 427 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2608 kg | 2461 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3890 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 86 L |