2005 Chevrolet Silverado vs. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Silverado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Silverado would be higher. At 5,736 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Silverado is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport weights approximately 180 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Silverado.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (640 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Silverado. (488 Nm). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Silverado.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Silverado | 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Land Rover |
| Model | Silverado | Range Rover Sport |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5736 cc | 3630 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 488 Nm | 640 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 17.3:1 |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2608 kg | 2788 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 4980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3890 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 22.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 88 L |
