2005 Chevrolet Silverado vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Silverado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Silverado would be higher. At 5,359 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Silverado is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Silverado weights approximately 559 kg more than 2008 Rover 75.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Silverado (454 Nm) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 75. (240 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Silverado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 75. 2005 Chevrolet Silverado has automatic transmission and 2008 Rover 75 has manual transmission. 2008 Rover 75 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Chevrolet Silverado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Silverado | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
Model | Silverado | 75 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 5359 cc | 2497 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 454 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96.1 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 82.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2094 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5850 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 9.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 65 L |