2005 Chevrolet Silverado vs. 2013 Mazda CX-09
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-09 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Silverado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Silverado would be higher. At 5,736 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Silverado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Silverado (300 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2013 Mazda CX-09. (269 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Silverado should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda CX-09. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Silverado weights approximately 546 kg more than 2013 Mazda CX-09. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Silverado (488 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda CX-09. (366 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Silverado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda CX-09.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Silverado | 2013 Mazda CX-09 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Silverado | CX-09 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5736 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 488 Nm | 366 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.3:1 |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2608 kg | 2062 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 5108 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 1728 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3890 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 12.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 76 L |