2005 Chevrolet Spark vs. 1966 Mini MK I
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Spark is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mini MK I would be higher. At 848 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Mini MK I is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Spark (51 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1966 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Spark should accelerate faster than 1966 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Spark weights approximately 161 kg more than 1966 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Spark (70 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Mini MK I. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Spark will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Spark | 1966 Mini MK I | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
| Model | Spark | MK I |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 796 cc | 848 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 70 Nm | 61 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 776 kg | 615 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2040 mm |
