2005 Chevrolet Spark vs. 1969 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Spark is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Riley Kestrel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Riley Kestrel (64 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. (51 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Riley Kestrel should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 134 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Riley Kestrel (96 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. (70 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1969 Riley Kestrel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Spark.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Spark | 1969 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Chevrolet | Riley |
Model | Spark | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 1275 cc |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 96 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 776 kg | 910 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 25 L |