2005 Chevrolet Spark vs. 1984 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Spark is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,270 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Nissan Pulsar (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. (51 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 104 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Nissan Pulsar (96 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. (69 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1984 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Spark.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Spark | 1984 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Spark | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2005 | 1984 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 1270 cc |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 69 Nm | 96 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 776 kg | 880 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2420 mm |