2005 Chevrolet Spark vs. 1996 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Spark is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,323 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda Midge (67 HP) has 16 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda Midge weights approximately 196 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda Midge (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. (70 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1996 Mazda Midge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Spark.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Spark | 1996 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Spark | Midge |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 796 cc | 1323 cc |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 70 Nm | 101 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 776 kg | 972 kg |
