2005 Chevrolet Spark vs. 1996 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Spark is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 1,389 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Volkswagen Polo (59 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. (51 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 244 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Volkswagen Polo (116 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. (70 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1996 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Spark.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Spark | 1996 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volkswagen |
Model | Spark | Polo |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 1389 cc |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 776 kg | 1020 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2410 mm |