2005 Chevrolet Spark vs. 2000 Mazda 323
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Spark is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,324 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mazda 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mazda 323 (74 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 323 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mazda 323 weights approximately 371 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mazda 323 (109 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. (70 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2000 Mazda 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Spark.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Spark | 2000 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Spark | 323 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 1324 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 70 Nm | 109 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 776 kg | 1147 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 55 L |