2005 Chevrolet Spark vs. 2001 Rover 25
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Spark is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Rover 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Rover 25 would be higher. At 1,119 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Rover 25 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Rover 25 (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. (51 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Rover 25 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Rover 25 weights approximately 254 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Rover 25 (95 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. (69 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2001 Rover 25 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Spark.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Spark | 2001 Rover 25 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
Model | Spark | 25 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 1119 cc |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 69 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 776 kg | 1030 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 50 L |