2005 Chevrolet Spark vs. 2003 Proton 400
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Spark is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Proton 400 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Proton 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Proton 400 (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. (51 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Proton 400 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Proton 400 weights approximately 194 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Proton 400 (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. (70 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2003 Proton 400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Spark.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Spark | 2003 Proton 400 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Proton |
Model | Spark | 400 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 1299 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 776 kg | 970 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2510 mm |