2005 Chevrolet Spark vs. 2004 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Spark is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda MPV (200 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. (51 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda MPV weights approximately 953 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda MPV (267 Nm) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. (69 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Spark.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Spark | 2004 Mazda MPV | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Spark | MPV |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 2966 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 69 Nm | 267 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 776 kg | 1729 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 75 L |