2005 Chevrolet Spark vs. 2009 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Spark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Spark would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. (51 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 433 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (170 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. (69 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2009 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Spark.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Chevrolet Spark 2009 Volkswagen Polo
Make Chevrolet Volkswagen
Model Spark Polo
Year Released 2005 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 796 cc 1984 cc
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 51 HP 114 HP
Engine RPM 5900 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 69 Nm 170 Nm
Torque RPM 4600 RPM 2400 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.3:1 10.5:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 776 kg 1209 kg
Wheelbase Size 2350 mm 2470 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 35 L 45 L