2005 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 1953 Riley RM A
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Riley RM A would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 1384 kg more than 1953 Riley RM A.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Suburban | 1953 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Riley |
| Model | Suburban | RM A |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 335 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 9 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2619 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5580 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2870 mm |
